Submit Legalised murder -taking of another life in this way is inhumane No-one is entirely good or bad-saintly or evil we are a mixture of both.
October 21, Gloria Kopp Writing Samples 8 The majority of Americans have a clear and strong stance when it comes to the death penalty, no matter which side of the debate they sit on.
Supporters of this punishment argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime, and that justice is being served. My personal stance on the death penalty is that it is an outdated and ineffective punishment, serving no true benefit to society and causing more harm than good to society as a whole.
When looking at the argument that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to others thinking about committing the same crime, we need only look to other countries around the world as examples to disprove this. Throughout the world, we are able to see that, in those countries where there is no death penalty, murders and other violent crimes happen at a much lower rate than in the United States.
It does seem counter-intuitive, but the evidence is clear. We can also clearly see that, in the United States, many people still commit these horrendous crimes, knowing full well that capital punishment exists.
In the heat of the moment, when a person is not thinking clearly and logically, the existence of the death penalty and the possibility that they could be facing this punishment does not typically cross their mind, and cause them to alter their behavior.
We can see this in the consistent, and increasing, number of violent crimes being committed year after year in this country. There have also been widely publicised cases of wrongly convicted individuals, who were either put to death or were awaiting their punishment, that were revealed to be innocent.
In the cases where the death penalty had already been carried out, it was too late for those innocent people. Having even one innocent person put to death wrongly is a crime unto itself. We must also look at the mental competence of the individuals being convicted and sentenced to this punishment.
If a person is not mentally capable of processing and understanding the actions they have committed, it is ethically wrong to execute them for this. There have been advancements in the technologies being used to enact the death penalty that are designed to lessen the pain and suffering a person endures.
But, in reality, the only individuals who can attest to their effectiveness are those being executed. We cannot say for certain whether or not someone suffered unduly while they were being executed, whether everything worked as it should to ensure a quick and painless death.
And, yes, there are those who will argue that a death marked by pain and suffering is a part of the justice being served. But, as we try to hold ourselves as a nation to a higher standard than our worst criminals, we should at the very least allow our justice system to work as it should, according to the Supreme Court.
And, nowhere in history has the Supreme Court ever advocated for the use of cruel and unusual punishment. We would like to think that we have more compassion and humanity than those who have committed such horrendous crimes, and as such, we should demonstrate this by showing them the humanity they denied someone else, not by sinking to their level.
When we look at the evidence from around the world on the effectiveness of capital punishment as a deterrent, as well as the ethical dilemma of potentially executing innocent or mentally incompetent individuals, it is easy to see that the practice of capital punishment offers no benefits to our society.Since man has been around, the death penalty has been used as a way to deter crimes and as a way to punish those who choose to commit a crime deemed by their legal system or leader as punishable by death.
In recent years a moral dispute has been raging over whether capital punishment should. The death penalty statutes were overturned and then reinstated in the United States during the 's due to questions concerning its fairness (Flanders 50). The death penalty began to be reinstated slowly, but the rate of executions has increased during the 's (Winters).
There are a number of arguments in favor of the death penalty. An Argument in Favor of Shunning the Death Penalty in the United States PAGES 2. WORDS View Full Essay. More essays like this: argument in favor.
Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Exactly what I needed. - Jenna Kraig, student @ UCLA. Wow. Most helpful essay resource ever! In the United States, capital punishment is deemed legal in 32 states. Since , 1, executions have been carried out in the country, with Texas (), Oklahoma (), and Virginia () accounting for more than half of the cases.
Arguments For and Against the Reintroduction of the Death Penalty for Murder The death penalty was abolished in the United Kingdom in (Blackwell ) The abolishment of the death penalty was not a simple case.
The emigration to the United States hurts the home country, as much of the male population, workers, and top intellectuals often leave their country. Unlike the the United States, most countries don't have an immigration problem.